that rhythm is infectious!
© meliapond

chronicallyuntidy:

onegirlinalltheworld:

loonylunalovegood97:

nodaybuttodaytodefygravity:

I just wanted to have a moment of appreciation for my favorite female-led non-romantic comedies

Can we appreciate how feminist all these movies are in completely different ways?

Pitch Perfect and Bridesmaids proved that yes, a comedy with an all girl cast is possible, and both guys and girls will fucking love it

Easy A is filled to the brim with slut-shaming and how fucking ridiculous it is

She’s the Man has the traditional type of plot of a tomboy girl succeeding in a male-dominated area (typical does not mean bad)

Mean Girls is all about the cattiness of girls and how that shit has got to stop. (“You’ve got to stop calling each other sluts and whores. It just makes it okay for guys to call you sluts and whores”)

And Legally Blonde is a personal favorite. Beauty does not mean ignorance, femininity does not mean inferiority. You can be kick-ass, intelligent and feminist even when you’re wearing pink. This kinda message seems a little harder to come by when it comes to “empowered women” in the media.

Basically, these movies are progressive gold

Can we also add to this list:

  • Bring It On, which creates real friendships based on mutual respect among a group of cheerleaders (who are often stereotyped as being catty or cutthroat) while simultaneously confirming the validity of cheerleaders as athletes
  • Hairspray, whose leading lady shops at plus-size stores and marches against segregation
  • Stick It, which shows us solidarity among a collective of young girls who were supposed to be pitted against each other in competition and judged by balding men; instead, they take matters into their own hands and throw all of their events, reclaiming their agency by selecting winners among themselves
  • 10 Things I Hate About You, which demonstrates that you can be an uncompromising feminist “bitch” and a good person (and that sisters, even when they fight a lot, have incredibly meaningful relationships)
  • and Bend It Like Beckham, whose protagonist maintains her relationship with her traditional family while still kicking ass on the soccer field with her tomboy best friend.

This. Alllll of the this.

posted 1 month ago with 5,494 notes
via transmutes · © riboku
missturdle:

Izumi Curtis is a wonderful, chronically ill, kind, friendly housewife who is also an alchemist who will fuck shit up if you hurt her family.
Courtesy of Arakawa’s: There’s no wrong way to approach femininity, womanhood, or asskicking school of thought.

missturdle:

Izumi Curtis is a wonderful, chronically ill, kind, friendly housewife who is also an alchemist who will fuck shit up if you hurt her family.

Courtesy of Arakawa’s: There’s no wrong way to approach femininity, womanhood, or asskicking school of thought.

(Source: turdlewexler)

posted 1 month ago with 881 notes

♡ ♡ ♡ Challenge internalized misogyny ♡ ♡ ♡

♡ ♡ ♡ Challenge internalized misogyny ♡ ♡ ♡

(Source: gale-hawthorne)

posted 1 month ago with 7,607 notes

itookmyprozactoday:

feminist zooey

posted 2 months ago with 39,628 notes
kawabiala:

vintagegal:

“La Belle Dame sans Merci” by Frank Dicksee, 1902

This picture is fascinating to me because of its portrayal of a powerful female character who doesn’t fall into any of the typical modern ‘Strong Female Character’ cliches.
The woman is the powerful, sexually assertive and threatening figure here, while the man is the more passive figure, visibly vulnerable to her. However, this portrayal of a woman as assertive and powerful doesn’t rely either on sexualizing her or on presenting that power in masculine ways.
This Belle Dame is traditionally feminine, drawn in flowing lines and curves. She is sexually assertive but not sexualized. The man is armed, masculine, stiff and drawn in straight, square lines - all stereotypically masculine, but his body language and expression make it obvious that he is the submissive and less powerful party here. His vulnerability is not expressed by de-masculinizing him, just as her power is not shown by making her any less feminine.
Some modern artists could stand to take lessons from Mr Dicksee.

kawabiala:

vintagegal:

“La Belle Dame sans Merci” by Frank Dicksee, 1902

This picture is fascinating to me because of its portrayal of a powerful female character who doesn’t fall into any of the typical modern ‘Strong Female Character’ cliches.

The woman is the powerful, sexually assertive and threatening figure here, while the man is the more passive figure, visibly vulnerable to her. However, this portrayal of a woman as assertive and powerful doesn’t rely either on sexualizing her or on presenting that power in masculine ways.

This Belle Dame is traditionally feminine, drawn in flowing lines and curves. She is sexually assertive but not sexualized. The man is armed, masculine, stiff and drawn in straight, square lines - all stereotypically masculine, but his body language and expression make it obvious that he is the submissive and less powerful party here. His vulnerability is not expressed by de-masculinizing him, just as her power is not shown by making her any less feminine.

Some modern artists could stand to take lessons from Mr Dicksee.

posted 2 months ago with 19,026 notes
“Feminism has fought no wars. It has killed no opponents. It has set up no concentration camps, starved no enemies, practiced no cruelties. Its battles have been for education, for the vote, for better working conditions, for safety in the streets, for child care, for social welfare, for rape crisis centres, women’s refuges, reforms in the law. If someone says, ‘Oh, I’m not a feminist’, I ask, ‘Why? What’s your problem?’”
- Dale Spender, Man Made Language.  (via izzyinvisible)

(Source: uowfreeschool)

posted 2 months ago with 11,125 notes
countthesloths:

did-you-kno:

Source

i am dying
posted 2 months ago with 17,770 notes
posted 2 months ago with 137,904 notes

heartthrobbstark:

: there is no such thing as a slut

glamaphonic:

there is no such thing as a slut

  • there is no such thing as a slut
  1. there is
  2. no such thing
  3. as a slut

a slut is not a thing that exists unless you are a misogynist

it is an insult predicated entirely on the completely erroneous idea that there is any amount or manner or style of consensual sex that it is okay for a woman to have and once she passes that threshold it’s no longer okay

there is no such thing as a slut

a slut is not a thing that exists unless you are a misogynist

when you or your narrative defend a woman against being called a slut by demonstrating that she doesn’t actually cross that threshold

not willingly

not without coercion

not without manipulation

not without intense regret

you are slut-shaming

because you are asserting

that there IS a such a thing as a slut

all you’ve done is deigned to exonerate that particular woman

who was misunderstood and lied on and reduced to sluthood by the cruel cruel world

you are still perpetuating the idea that

the threshold exists

and that out there somewhere

where some women have crossed it

willingly

enthusiastically

consensually

there must be sluts

but there aren’t

because

there is no such thing as a slut

a slut is not a thing that exists unless you are a misogynist

posted 2 months ago with 3,158 notes